Socio-Economic and Environmental Attitudinal Determinants of Rainforest Protection: A Logit Model Analysis

  • Okojie O. I.
Keywords: Environmental attitudinal attributes, rainforest protection, binary choice model, willingness to pay, cost sharing.

Abstract

This paper investigates the nature of socio-economic and environmental attitudinal attributes of people on rainforest protection. The multi-stage sampling procedure was applied.The methodology involved descriptive statistics and binary choice logit model. The result shows public awareness of deforestation and the need to protect the forest resources for future generations. The need for their present survival over-rides the long term interest of sustainable use. The willingness to embrace cost sharing of rainforest protection with the industrialized countries of the world was equally shown.  Weak pro-environmental attitudes were shown. The log of bid and rainforest visitor dummy had negative and significant effect on the willingness to pay (WTP) for rainforest protection (p<0.01). Income and educational level attained had a positive and significant relationship with rainforest protection (p<0.01). The food crop producer dummy was positive and significant (p<0.01). Environmental awareness needs to be put in place. Dialogues on sharing the cost burden of rainforest protection need to be effected.  Wage increases and sustainable agro forestry practices need to be put in place. These will go a long way in enhancing food crop production and positive environmental accounting by the rainforests.

 

References

Abala, D. 1987. A theoretical and empirical investigation of the willingness-to-pay for recreational services: a case study of the Nairobi National Park. Eastern African Economics Review 3.2: 28-30

Arild Angelsen, Kaimowitz David 1999. Rethinking the causes of deforestation: lessons from economic models. The World Bank Research Observer 114(1): 73-98.

Bojo, J. 1993. Economic valuation of indigenous woodlands. P. N. Bradley and K. McNamara, Eds. Living with trees: policies for forestry management in Zimbabwe. Technical Paper No 210, Washington DC: World Bank.

Brown Katerina, Pearce David W. Eds, 1994. The causes of tropical deforestation: the economic and statistical analysis of factors giving rise to the loss of the tropical forests. London: University College London Press.

Bulte, E. H., G. C. van Kooten 1999. Marginal valuation of charismatic species: implications for conservation. Environmental and Resource Economics 14(1): 119-130.

Burgesss, J. C. 1991. Economic analysis of frontier agricultural expansion and tropical deforestation. M. S. Thesis, University College, London. Environmental and Resource Economics, Processed.

Cooper J.C, John Loomis 1992. Sensitivity of willingness-to-pay to bid design in dichotomous choice contingent valuation models. Land Economics 68(2): 211-224.

Georgious S. Whittington, D. Pearce, M. Dominic. 1997. Eds. Economic values and the environment in developing world. Edward Elgar Publishing Ltd.

Hanemann, W. M. 1984. Welfare evaluations in contingent valuation experiments with discrete responses. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 66:332-341.

Hirsholeifer, Jack 1984. Price theory and application. 3rd Edition. Prentice Hall International Inc.

Kaimowitz David, Arild Angelsen 1998. Economic models of tropical deforestation: a review. Bogor, Indonesia: Center for International Forestry Research.

Kant Shashi, Anke Redantz 1997. An econometric model of tropical deforestation. Journal of Forest Economics 3(1): 51-86.

Kotchen M. J., S. D. Reiling 2000. Environmental attitudes, motivations and contingent valuation of non-use values: a case study involving endangered species. Ecological Economics 32(1): 93-107.

Kramer, R. A., Mercer E, N. Sharma 1995. Valuing tropical rainforest protection using the contingent valuation method. W. L. Adamowicz, P. C. Boxall, M. K. Luckert, W. E. Phillips and W. A. White Eds. Forestry, economics and the environment. CAB International. 181-194.

McCollum, D. W., K. J. Boyle, 2005. The effect of respondent experience/knowledge in the elicitation of contingent values: an investigation of convergent validity, procedural invariance and reliability. Environmental and Resource Economics 30 (1): 23 – 33.

National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration NOAA 1993. Natural resources damage assessments under the Oil Pollution Act of 1990. Federal Register 58(10): 4601-4614.

Okojie, J. A. 1998. Once upon a forest: the master piece of creation. First Inaugural Lecture. Abeokuta: University of Agriculture.

Okojie, L. O. 1997. Forest and forest industry in environmentally sound and sustainable development: A global outlook. Obiaga and Abu eds. Proceedings of the 25th Annual Conference of the Forestry Association of Nigeria. pp 56 – 64.

Ruitenbeck, H. J. 1992. The rainforest supply price: a tool for evaluating the rainforest conservation expenditures. Ecological Economics 6(2): 45-62.

Ryan, M., Ratecliffe J , J. Tucker 1997. Using willingness to pay to value alternative model of antenatal care. Social Science and Medicine 44 (3): 371-380.

Teal, G. A, J. B. Loomis 2000. Effects of gender and parental status on the economic valuation of increasing wetlands, reducing wildlife contamination and increasing salmon populations. Society and Natural Resources 13 (1) 1-14.

Turcin Branka, Kelly Giraud 2001. Contingent valuation willingness to pay with respect to geographical nested samples: case study of Alaskan Stellar Sea Lion, W-133 Western Regional Project Technical Meeting Proceedings.
Section
Articles