PRODUCTIVITY DISPERSION AND SOURCES OF TECHNICAL INEFFICIENCY IN SMALLHOLDER TIMBER MILLS IN OGUN STATE, NIGERIA
Abstract
The concept of technical efficiency is critical to measuring the firm performance, determining the degree of innovative technology adoption, overall production efficiency and sustainability of livelihood options. Our research evaluates technical efficiencies in the sawmilling sector. Specifically, the main objective of the study was to assess technical efficiency dispersion and determine the significant, firm-specific, factors that cause technical inefficiencies in sawmilling operations. Maximum-likelihood methods are applied in the estimation of the parameters of the model. In the study, panel (3 years) data from 68 sawmills was used in the empirical analysis. The primary decision-maker in the sawmill has an average age of 53years with a mean of 17years of experience in sawmill management. The average operational age of the sawmill is 13years. There were considerable wide variations, at the firm level, in technical efficiencies recorded over the periods. The estimated average technical efficiency of the sampled sawmills for the three years (2007-2009) is 61.9%. The result revealed that the initial efficiency gained in 2007 was not sustained as efficiency dropped in 2009 to 57.9%. The firm specific variables that influence technical efficiencies are owner’s status as timber contractor, ownership of timber trucks, years of experience and age of the manager. The study recommends that technical and management training/workshop should be organized by relevant government agencies to regularly update operators’ knowledge. Import policies should be targeted to encourage acquisition and use of modern sawmilling machines and equipment. Also, public power supply to the sawmill clusters should be improved to reduce the high processing cost associated with the use of diesel powered electricity generation sets.
References
Alene, A.D., Manyong, V.M., Gockowski, J. 2006. The Production Efficiency of Intercropping Annual and Perennial crops in Southern Ethiopia: A Comparison of Distance Functions and Production Frontiers. Agricultural Systems, 91: 51-70.
Alvarez, R., Crespi, G. 2003. Determinants of Technical Efficiency in Small Firms. Small Business Economics, 20: 233–244.
Barham, B.L., Coomes, O.T., Takasaki, Y. 1999. Rain Forest Livelihoods: Income Generation, Household Wealth and Forest Use. Unasylva. 50(198): 34-42.
Battese, G.E., Coelli, T. 1995. A Model for Technical Inefficiency Effects in a Stochastic Frontier Production Function for Panel Data. Empirical Economics, 20(2):325-332.
Bauer, P.W. 1990. Recent Developments in the Econometric Estimation of Frontiers. Journal of Econometrics, 46(12): 39-56.
Binam, J.N., Tonyè, J., Wandji, N., Nyambi, G., Akoa, M. 2004. Factors Affecting the Technical Efficiency among Smallholder Farmers in the Slash and Burn Agriculture zone of Cameroon. Food Policy, 29: 531-545.
Bowles, I.A., Rice, R.E., Mittermeier, R.A., Fonseca, G.A. 1998. Logging and Tropical Forest Conservation. Science, 280: 1899-1990.
Chavas, J., Petrie, R., Roth, M. 2005. Farm Household Production Efficiency: Evidence from the Gambia. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 87: 160-179.
Coelli, T.J. 1996. A Guide to Frontier Version 4.1: A Computer Program for Frontier Production Function Estimation. CEPA Working paper 96/07. Armidale, Dept of Econometrics, University of New England.
Deacon, R.T. 1994. Deforestation and the Rule of Law. Land Economics, 70: 414-430.
FAO 2001. Global Forest Resources Assessment 2000: Main Report. FAO Forestry Paper No.140. Rome.
FAO. 2009. State of the World’s Forests. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome, Italy.
Gerwing, J.J., Johns, J.S., Vidal, E. 1996. Reducing Waste During Logging and Log Processing: Forest Conservation in Eastern Amazonia. Unasylva, 187(47): 17-25.
Gumbau-Albert, M., Maudos, J. 2002. The Determinants of Efficiency: the Case of the Spanish Industry, Applied Economics, 34: 1941-1948
Haji, J. 2006. Production Efficiency of Smallholders’ Vegetable-Dominated Mixed Farming System in Eastern Ethiopia: A Non-Parametric Approach. Journal of African Economies, 16(1): 1-27.
Holmes, T.P., Blate, G.M., Zweede, J.C., Pereira, R.J., Barreto, P., Boltz, F., Bauch, R. 2000. Financial Costs and Benefits of Reduced Impact Logging Relative to Conventional Logging in the Eastern Amazon. Washington, D.C. Tropical Forest Foundation.
http://earthtrends.wri.org Forests, Grassland and Drylands in Nigeria, pg. 2
http://www.fao.org/countryprofiles/index.asp?subj=5&iso3=NGA pg. 56
Idachaba, F.S. 2006. Good Intentions are Not Enough: A Reading on Agricultural Policy of Nigeria. University Press Ltd. 1: 23
Iversen, V., Chhetry, B., Francis, P., Gurung, M., Kafle, G., Pain, A., Seeley, J. 2006. High Value Forests, Hidden Economies and Elite Capture: Evidence From Forest User Groups in Nepal’s Terai. Ecological Economics, 58: 93-107.
Karagiannis, G., Kien, C., Tzouvelekas, V. 2003. On the Choice of Functional Forms in Stochastic Frontier Modeling. Empirical Economics, 28(1): 75-100.
Kumbhaker, S.C., Lovell, C. 2000. Stochastic Frontier Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Kumbhakar, S.C. 2002. Specification and Estimation of Production Risk, Risk Preferences and Technical Efficiency. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 84: 8–22.
National Bureau of Statistics 2008. Population and Distribution of States by Poverty Headcount in Nigeria. NBS, Abuja. P. 34.
Nelson, J. 2006. Timber Economic Benefits. BC Journal of Ecosystems and Management, 7(1): 92–98.
Place, F., Otsuka, K. 1998. Population Density, Land Tenure, and Tree Resource Management in Uganda. International Food Policy Centre. EPTD Discussion Paper 24.
Vincent, J.R. 1995. Timber Trade, Economics, and Tropical Forest Management. In: Primack, B.R., Lovejoy, T.J. (Eds.) Ecology, Conservation, and Management of Southeast Asian Rainforests. Yale University Press, New Haven, CT. P. 241-262.
Wallace, T., Newman, D. 1986. Measurement of Ownership Effects on Forest Productivity in North Carolina from 1874-1984. Canadian Journal of Forest Resource, 16: 733-738.
Wang. H., Schmidt, P. 2002. One-step and Two-step Estimation of the Effects of Exogenous Variables on Technical Efficiency Levels. Journal of Productivity Analysis, 18(2): 129-144.
Wunder, S. 2001. Poverty Alleviation and Tropical Forests – What Scope for Synergies? World Development, 29: 1817-1833.