Effects of Concurrent Administration of Bupivacaine on the Hypnosis of Thiopentone in Dogs

  • Sogebi E A
  • Adetunji I A
Keywords: Bupivacaine, Dogs, Hypnosis, Thiopentone.

Abstract

This study evaluated the effect of bupivacaine pretreatment on certain indices of thiopentone hypnosis in unmedicated dogs. Five healthy, unmedicated dogs underwent two series of trials one week apart. In the first series of trials, each dog received intramuscular injection of 0.5mg/kg 0.5% bupivacaine , induced, 20 min later, with the intravenous injection of 25mg/kg 2% thiopentone and then endotracheally intubated. The procedure was repeated for the second series, replacing bupivacaine with 2ml normal saline solution as control. In all trials, analgesia was assessed at 2min intervals using pedal withdrawal response to haemostatic forceps closed to the first ratchet. Calculated indices were compared with control values using student’s ‘T’ test for paired data. Differences were considered significant at p<0.05. Time to intubation (11.2±2.0 min), onset of analgesia (11.1+1.9),duration of analgesia (19.4+7.2) and duration of hypnosis (50.0±5.2 min) in the experimental groups were significantly longer than the corresponding control values of 3.8±0.8 min, 3.4±0.7min, 8.4±1.5 min and 44.6±10.0 min. Duration of intubation (41.0+5.1), time to sternal posture (44.4±16.5 min) and time to standing (21.6±20.1 min) were not significantly different from corresponding control values of 8.7+7.8 min,18.2± 4.7 min and 13.4±4.5 min. It was thus concluded that the concurrent administration of bupivacaine with thiopentone resulted in prolonged hypnosis of 50.0 + 5.2 min duration.

References

Ben-Shlomo, I., Tverskoy M., Fleyshman, G., Chernavsky, G. 1997. ‘Hypnotic effect of IV propofol is enhanced by IM administration of bupivacaine’. Br J Anaesth 78 : 375-377.

Hall, L.M. 1991. ‘Veterinary Anaesthesia’. 9th edn. Bailliere Tindall, London 116 pp.

Clarke, K.W., Heavner, J.E., 1996. ‘Drug interactions’. In: Thurmon JC,tranquilly WJ., and Benson, GJ. (eds). Lumb and Jones Veterinary Anaesthesia.3rd edn. Williams and Wilkins, Baltimore. 35-39 pp.

Kanto, J.,Gepts, E.1989. ‘Pharmacokinetic implications for the clinical use of propofol’. Clinical Pharmacokinetics 17: 308-326.

McGrath, C.J. 1987. ‘Drug interactions’. In: Short C.E (ed):Principles and Practice of Veterinary anesthesia. Williams ,Wilkins, Baltimore. 154-157 pp.

Murad, F., Gilman, A.G. 1985. ‘Drug interactions’. In: Gilman AG ,Goodman LS, Rall TW (eds) : Goodman and Gilmans. The Phamacological Basis of Therapeutics. 7th ed. Macmillan Publishing Co, New York.1734-1750 pp.

Short, C.E. 1983. ‘Practical use of Ultrashort-Acting barbiturates’ Veterinary Learning system. Co. Princeton. 76 pp.

Skarda, R.A. 1996. ‘Local and regional anaesthetic and analgesic techniques’ dogs in Thurmon J.C, Tranquilli W.J, Benson G.J (edn) Lumb and Jones Veterinary Anaesthesia 3rd edn Williams and Wilkins, Baltimore. 426-448 pp.

Zimber, A. 1986. ‘Useful drug interactions’ A review Israel J Vet Med 42:27-38.
Section
Articles