Egg Production of two Nigerian Local chicken Ecotypes under improved Management

  • Momoh O M
  • Nwosu C C
  • Adeyinka I A
Keywords: Heavy”, “Light”, Evaluation, Hen-day, Part-period.

Abstract

The Nigerian local chickens were conceptually categorized on the basis of body weight and body size into two groups namely, “heavy” ecotype and “light” ecotype. The ecotypes were evaluated for egg production under improved management conditions using fifty point of lay (POL) pullets of each ecotype placed individually per cell in a two-tier battery cages. Hen-day egg production was monitored for 52 weeks. Other parameters evaluated include egg number, egg weight and egg mass. Egg number, egg weight and egg mass were each divided into part-period (first 3 months of lay), residual period (12 months minus the first 3 months of lay) and total or annual period production. Results showed an average hen-day percentage production of 38.0 and 40.11 for the “heavy” and “light” ecotypes, respectively. Total annual egg number, egg weight and egg mass for the “heavy” ecotype was 135.69 eggs, 40.34 g and 5740.85 g, respectively. The corresponding values for the “light” ecotype were 144.19 eggs, 37.32 g and 5008.21 g. The “heavy” ecotype did not differ (p > 0.05) from the “light” ecotype in hen-day production, egg number and egg mass except in egg weight. The “heavy” ecotype produced significantly (P < 0.05) heavier eggs than the “light” ecotypes.

 

References

Adedokun, S. A. and Sonaiya, E. B. 2001. Comparison of the performance of Nigerian indigenous chickens from three agro-ecological zones. Livestock Research for Rural Development 3(2).

A.O.A.C. 2000. Association of Official Analytical Chemist Inc. Official Method of Analysis 17th edition, Washington DC.

Fairfull, R. W. 1982. Combining ability, heterosis and reciprocal effects for first and second year performance in six selected Leghorn strains crossed in a complete dialed. Proc. 31st Nat. Breeders Roundtable (Edinburgh) 112-120.

Gowe, R. S., Fairfull, R. W. 1982. Heterosis in egg-type chickens. Proc. 2nd World congress on Genetics Applied to Livestock Production (Madrid) 6:228-242.

Hill, D. H., Modebe, A.N.A 1961. Poultry Production at the University college, Ibadan (1950-1958) University of Ibadan, Faculty of Agriculture Technical bulletin No. 2.

Inyang, P. E. B. 1978. The Climate of Nsukka Environs. In: The Nsukka Environment Ed. Ofomata, C.E.K. Enugu. Fourth dimension publishers.

Momoh, O. M. 2005. Genetic and Phenotypic Evaluation of the Nigerian Heavy Chicken Ecotype and its crossbreds with the Light Ecotype. Ph. D thesis, University of Agriculture, Makurdi. 164pp.

Momoh, O. M., Tule, J. J., Nwosu, C. C 2006. Towards the development of ‘surrogate’ brooder hens for rural poultry production. Journal of Sustainable Tropical Agricultural Research 20: 1 – 5

Monanu, P. C. 1975. Temperature and Sunrise. In: Nigeria in Maps: Eastern states. Ed. Ofomata, C. E. K. Benin city Ethiope Publishing House.

Nwosu, C. C., Omeje, S. S. I. 1985. Improved annual egg production from Nigeria local chicken by Gold-link cross progeny. Nig. J. Anim. prod.12 (1&2) 161-164.

Nwosu, C. C. 1990. Review of indigenous poultry research in South-Eastern Nigeria. In: Rural Poultry Production in Africa. Ed.

Oluyemi, J. A., Roberts, F. A. 1979. Poultry Production in Warm Wet Climate. 1st ed. London. Macmillan Ltd. 244pp

Sonaiya, E. B. 1997. Africa Network for Rural Poultry Development progress reports November 1989-June 1995. In: Sustainable Rural Poultry Production in Africa. Ed. Sonaiya, E. B. Proc. International workshop Addis Abbaba, Ethiopia. ANRPD 134-143.

Sonaiya, E. B. Odubote, I. K. Badmans, R., Denney, F., Wimmers, K., Valle Zarate A., Horst, P. 1998. Evaluation of Nigeria local poultry ecotypes. International Network for Family Poultry Devel
Section
Articles