Relationships between Seed Testing Traits, field Emergence and seed yield of sesame (sesamun indicum l.) Under different Plant population environments
Abstract
Relationships between variables of seed testing traits and field emergence as well as seed yield of 14 indigenous sesame genotypes were tested at three plant population densities. Seed samples were taken from different harvests to conducts seed quality tests in the laboratory and to determine field emergence and seed yield under the three plant population densities. The results indicated that significant differences existed among the genotypes for all traits examined except emergence rate index. Genotypes 530-6-1,69B-88Z, 530-3 and C-K-2 appeared to have good seed quality and high seed yield. Coefficients of correlation between field emergence or seed yield and seed testing traits differed for the three plant population densities. Seed germination, seedling vigour index, excess water stress germination (EWSG) and plumule length were positively correlated with field emergence at low plant density of 133,3333 plant ha1 while at high population densities of 266,667 plant ha1 seedling vigour index had high and positive correlation with field emergence. Results of regression coefficients showed that 1000-seed weight as the best contributor to the regression equation, accounting for 36% of variation in field emergence and 13% for seed yield per plant. However, the contributions of other seed testing traits to field emergence were significant but reduced the variations from 8 to 1%. From this, it appears that prediction of seed yield of sesame from seed testing traits in the laboratory is more difficult than field emergence and found to be inefficient for both traits.
References
Adebisi, M.A., Ajala, M.O., Rasaki N. O. 2003. Comparison of seed vigour of sesame in laboratory and field tests. Journal of Tropical Forest Resources 19(3): 21-23.
Adebisi, M.A, Oyekale, K.O., Akintobi, D.C., Abdul-Rafiu, A.M. 2006. Variation in seed quality of West African rice (Oryza sativa (L.). Proceeding of the 31st Annual Conference of Genetic Society of Nigeria. Pp 60-66.
AOSA (Association of Official Seed Analysts) 1970. Tetrazolium testing handbook for agriculture seeds No. 29.
AOSA (Association of Official Seed Analysts) 1983. Seed vigour testing handbook No. 32.
Carnago, C.P., Vanghan, C.E. 1973. Effect of seed vigour on the performance and yield of grain sorghum. Proceedings of the Association of Official Seed Analysts, 63: 135 – 147.
Comstock, R.E., Moll, R.H. 1963. Genotype–environmental interactions. National Academy of Science. National Research Council Publication, 982:184-196.
Delouche, J.C., Baskin, C.C. 1973. Accelerated ageing techniques for predicting the relative storability of seed lots. Seed Sci. and Technol 1: 427-452.
Durrant, M.J., Bould, A., Brown, S. 1985. The assessment of the quality of sugar-beet seed. Journal of Agricultural Sciences, Cambridge 104:71 – 84.
Fakorede, M.A.B., Ojo D. K. 1981. Variability for seedling vigour in Maize. Expl. Agric. 17:195-201. Heartfield, J. L., Egli, D. B. 1974. Effect of temperature on the rate of soybean hypocotyls elongation and field emergence. Crop Science 14:423 – 426.
Heydecker, W. 1972. Vigour in viability of seeds (E. H. Roberts pp. 209-252. Chapman& Hall, London.
Kraak, H.L., Vos., J., Perry, D. A., Bekendam, J. 1984. Studies on field emergenceand vigour of sugar beet and onion seed. Seed Sci. and Technol, 12: 731 – 745.
Kim, S.H., Choe, Z.R., Kang, J.H., Copeland, L.O., Elias, S.G. 1994. Multiple seed vigour indices to predict field emergence and performance of barley. Seed Sci. and Technol. 22:29-68.
Lovato A., Cagalli, S. 1992. Sugar beet (Beta vulgaris L.) seed vigour compared in laboratory and field tests. Seed Sci. and Technol. 21:1-67.
Odiemah, M. 1991. Relation of seed testing traits to grain yield of maize hybrids under different environments. Seed Sci. and Technol. 19:25-32.
Odiemah, M. 1995. The relationship of temperature and N.P.K. content of grain toproperties of spring wheat seeds, produced under different protein treatments. Cereal Research Communications 13: 239-245.
Perry, D.A. 1978a. Report of the vigour test committee 1974 – 1977. Seed Sci. and Technol. 6:159 – 181.
Perry, D.A. 1978b. A vigour test for seeds of barley (Hordeum vulgare) based on measurement of plumule growth. Seed Sci. and Technol. 6:709-719.
Singh, K.B., Mehndiratta, P.D. 1970. Path-coefficient analysis and selection indices for cowpea. Indian J. Genet. Plant Breeding 30:471-475.
Tekrony, D.M., Egli, D.B. 1977. Relationship between laboratory indices of soybean seed vigour and field emergence. Crop Science 17:573-577.
Tiwari, S.P., Hariprasad, A.S. 1997. Selection criteria for seed longevity in soybean (Glycine max. (L.) Merr.). Tropical Agriculture (Trinidad) 74(1):70-72.
Yaklick, R.W., Kulik, M.M., Anderson, J. D. 1979. Evaluation of vigour tests in soybean seeds relationship of ATP, conductivity and radioactive tracer multiple criteria laboratory tests to field performance. Crop Science 19:806-810.
Yamauchi, M., Winn. T. 1996. Rice seed vigour and seedling establishment in anaerobic soil.. Crop Science. 36:680-686.